This content is quite serious, so I've tried to remove some colloquialisms. If there are still some colloquial expressions left, please understand... The main point I want to make is about the recent influx of new users. In the Discourse documentation, it is mentioned that:

At Discourse, we believe reading is the most fundamental and healthy action in any community.

Translated, it means that the developers of Discourse believe that reading is the most basic and healthy activity in any community.

However, many new users ask about upgrades and non-profit issues as soon as they join. These questions have all been addressed before. If you haven't read these active posts... Have you read the community's Frequently Asked Questions and Registration Requirements before? (whispering)

The community is for communication, not for joining just because there is a free API. I think, if you can't read the posts, you don't belong to this community.

Regarding the issue of 'small essays', it's really just about being sincere. In another topic, it is stated:

My concept is simple and unadorned: if you are willing to come here, willing to acknowledge here, then you are welcome here, you are a veteran friend.

For those who are about to become veteran friends, it is stated:

Secondly, we hope to know your大概加入意愿. Joining a community is a two-way choice. L site may be different in other people's mouths, but your personal experience is another story, not necessarily a good fit.

Finally, returning to the most fundamental issue: non-profit sites

First, I think the first question is whether non-profit sites should allow aff. Secondly, using level to measure a user always feels like 'blind men摸象'. There is a big gap between level 2 and level 3, and level 2 represents history, not the present.

I feel... I might have been a bit sharp. Maybe it's because I'm a bit upset... 🥺 (whispering)

69 posts - 18

[](https:///t/topic/1188824)

via - Hot Topics (author: Fengfeng10)

标签: none

评论已关闭